Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine: which one to choose in 2026?
Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Sourcegraph Cody |  Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Price | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp | No free tier · Code Assistant $39/user/mo (annual) · Agentic on quote |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Solid | Recommended |
| Best for | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. | Teams and companies that want a privacy- and IP-respecting code assistant. |
| Categories | Code | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Strengths
- Self-hostable (privacy)
- IP-clean models
- Completion + chat + agent
Weaknesses
- No more free tier
- Enterprise-oriented
- Heavier setup if self-hosted
Who is it for? Teams and companies that want a privacy- and IP-respecting code assistant.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", Sourcegraph Cody is the better pick. If it's more "Teams and companies that want a privacy- and IP-respecting code assistant.", go with Tabnine. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.