Comparison
Qodo (ex-CodiumAI) vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
Qodo (ex-CodiumAI) and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Qodo (ex-CodiumAI) |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Free · paid (enterprise custom) — see Qodo | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want to strengthen tests and code review with AI. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Code | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Generates meaningful tests
- Reviews pull requests
- Quality/integrity-focused
Weaknesses
- Less a daily typing copilot
- Enterprise is custom-priced
- Generated tests need review
Who is it for? Developers and teams who want to strengthen tests and code review with AI.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Developers and teams who want to strengthen tests and code review with AI.", Qodo (ex-CodiumAI) is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.