Comparison
OpenRouter vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
OpenRouter and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Free (50 req/day) · usage = provider price + 5.5% on credit purchase · BYOK 5% | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Developers who want to reach many AI models through a single API. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Code, Chatbots & assistants | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- One key for hundreds of models
- Auto fallback between providers
- Compared per-token pricing
- A few free models
Weaknesses
- Small fee on credits
- Developer audience only
- No mainstream interface
Who is it for? Developers who want to reach many AI models through a single API.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Developers who want to reach many AI models through a single API.", OpenRouter is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.