Comparison
n8n vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
n8n and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  n8n |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Self-hosted free · Cloud from €20/mo · Pro €50 | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Technical teams that want powerful, sovereign, self-hostable automation. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Automation, Code | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Open source and self-hostable
- Code when no-code falls short
- AI nodes (agents, LLMs, vector)
- Data control and controlled cost
Weaknesses
- More technical setup than Zapier
- Self-hosting = maintenance on you
- Slightly smaller integration catalog
Who is it for? Technical teams that want powerful, sovereign, self-hostable automation.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Technical teams that want powerful, sovereign, self-hostable automation.", n8n is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.
