Comparison
Devin (Cognition) vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
Devin (Cognition) and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Devin (Cognition) |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Price | Free · Pro $20/mo · Max $200 | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Dev teams who want to delegate end-to-end engineering tasks to an agent. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Code | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Truly autonomous agent (plan→PR)
- Delegates whole engineering tasks
- Human supervision possible
Weaknesses
- Usage cost (ACU) to watch
- Output to review and test
- Not suited to every task
Who is it for? Dev teams who want to delegate end-to-end engineering tasks to an agent.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Dev teams who want to delegate end-to-end engineering tasks to an agent.", Devin (Cognition) is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.
