Comparison
DeepSeek vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
DeepSeek and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  DeepSeek |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Free chat · usage-based API (from ~$0.14/M tokens) | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Those who want a powerful, very cheap LLM, especially via the API. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Chatbots & assistants, Code | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Excellent performance-per-dollar
- Free web chat
- Strong at reasoning and code
Weaknesses
- Smaller app ecosystem
- Privacy/hosting to assess per use case
- Versions and pricing change fast
Who is it for? Those who want a powerful, very cheap LLM, especially via the API.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Those who want a powerful, very cheap LLM, especially via the API.", DeepSeek is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.
