Comparison
Cohere vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
Cohere and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Free trial · usage-based: Command R $0.15/$0.60 per M tokens · Command A $2.50/$10 · private on quote | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Pro | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Teams building search or an assistant grounded in their documents. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Code, Chatbots & assistants | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Excellence at RAG and search
- Benchmark Embed and Rerank models
- Private deployment possible
- Strong multilingual
Weaknesses
- Developer / enterprise audience
- Less known to the public
- Mostly valuable for RAG cases
Who is it for? Teams building search or an assistant grounded in their documents.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Teams building search or an assistant grounded in their documents.", Cohere is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.