Comparison
Bolt.new vs Sourcegraph Cody: which one to choose in 2026?
Bolt.new and Sourcegraph Cody are two comparable tools. Here's the head-to-head, criterion by criterion, to choose based on your real-world use.
Detailed comparison
| Criterion |  Bolt.new |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Price | Free (tokens) · from $25/mo | Free/Pro discontinued (Jul 2025) · enterprise only (~$59/user/mo, unpublished) · individual successor: Amp |
| Level | Beginner | Pro |
| Verdict | Recommended | Solid |
| Best for | Makers and developers who want to turn an idea into a working web app in minutes. | Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve. |
| Categories | Code, Design | Code |
Each tool in brief
Strengths
- Prompt → running full-stack web app
- Installs dependencies and runs the project
- Fast visual iteration
- Code export and deployment
Weaknesses
- Free tokens burn quickly
- Better for prototyping than heavy production
- Code needs hardening for large projects
Who is it for? Makers and developers who want to turn an idea into a working web app in minutes.
Strengths
- Cross-repo intelligence (monorepos)
- Grounded in the whole codebase
- Built for large teams
Weaknesses
- Individual tier discontinued (enterprise only)
- Individuals pointed to Amp
- No consumer pricing
Who is it for? Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.
Our verdict
No universal winner: it depends on your need. If you're after "Makers and developers who want to turn an idea into a working web app in minutes.", Bolt.new is the better pick. If it's more "Large teams/enterprises with big monorepos to understand and evolve.", go with Sourcegraph Cody. Models move fast — check the latest versions and current pricing before deciding.
Partner link — we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
